Aktuell forskning


The validity of individual Rorschach variables: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the comprehensive system. Mihura JL1, Meyer GJ, Dumitrascu N, Bombel G. Psychol Bull. 2013 May;139(3):548-605. doi: 10.1037/a0029406. Epub 2012 Aug 27. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22925137

A second look at the validity of widely used Rorschach indices: comment on Mihura, Meyer, Dumitrascu, and Bombel (2013). Wood JM1, Garb HN2, Nezworski MT3, Lilienfeld SO4, Duke MC1. Psychol Bull. 2015 Jan;141(1):236-49. doi: 10.1037/a0036005. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25581287

Standards, accuracy, and questions of bias in Rorschach meta-analyses: reply to Wood, Garb, Nezworski, Lilienfeld, and Duke (2015). Mihura JL1, Meyer GJ1, Bombel G2, Dumitrascu N3. Psychol Bull. 2015 Jan;141(1):250-60. doi: 10.1037/a0038445. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25581288

Mer aktuell Rorschachforskning finns bl a på Rorschach Performance Assessment Systems (R-PAS) hemsida  http://www.r-pas.org/Articles.aspx


A Psychological Reading of Autism Spectrum Disorders Through the Wartegg-CWS. Di Renzo, M., et al. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research JPER – 2021, 29 (2), November, 90-110 FULL TEXT AVAILABLE

Crisi, A. & Palm, J. A. (2018). Statistical foundations of the Crisi Wartegg System. I The Crisi Wartegg System. NY/Abingdon: Routledge. 42-156. CWS_Statistical foundation

Crisi, A. (2021). Wartegg Drawing Completion Test (WDCT) for assessing disordered thought and perception. In I. B. Weiner & J. H. Kleiger (Eds.), Psychological assessment of disordered thinking and perception (pp. 187–206). American Psychological Association.